黑白仰鼻猴(Rhinopithecus bieti)西藏种群栖息地变化研究
其他题名Habitat alternation of Rhinopithecus bieti in Tibet, China
黄勇
学位类型硕士
导师朱建国 ; 权锐昌
2008-07
学位授予单位中国科学院研究生院
学位授予地点北京
关键词黑白仰鼻猴 地理信息系统 遥感 栖息地丧失与破碎化 一妻多夫制 栖息地保护 西藏
摘要黑白仰鼻猴(Rhinopithecus bieti)目前分布在金沙江和澜沧江之间横断山脉的一个狭小的区域范围内(26o14’N-29o20’N,99o15’E-99o37’E),海拔2 600 m(南部)- 4 200 m(北部)之间;目前大约有15群,数量估计约1700个体。是我国特有的灵长类之一,为国家Ⅰ级保护动物,在IUCN(世界自然保护联盟)2007受威胁物种红皮书中被列为濒危物种并处于小种群、高度片断化状态(ENC 2a)。西藏是黑白仰鼻猴分布的北端,约有300个体。基于前人的野外调查和报道确认,暗针叶林和针阔叶混交林是其适宜栖息地,人们在低海拔和高海拔砍伐或者火烧暗针叶林和针阔叶混交林的产物-农田和夏季牧场正在逐渐侵蚀着其适宜栖息地。尽管当地藏族村民信奉佛教,禁止猎杀任何野生动物,但是近些年来,黑白仰鼻猴栖息地不断丧失,这与牧场和农田扩张、当地人们薪柴采集等活动有关。 黑白仰鼻猴西藏种群主要在原始暗针叶林和和针阔叶混交林里活动。为了评估该物种的栖息地现状和变化情况,我们通过野外调查工作,应用GIS和RS技术,分别解译了1986年、1992年、1997年、2001年和2006年的Landsat TM/ETM+冬季卫星影像,并对解译结果进行了计算和分析,得到了以下西藏种群栖息地的主要结果:1)现有暗针叶林(包括原始针叶林和针阔混交林)面积是30 500 hm2,夏季牧场面积是13 100 hm2,农田面积是6 400 hm2;2)在过去20年间(1986-2006年),暗针叶林面积减少了14.6%(5 200 hm2),夏季牧场面积增加了47.2%(4 200 hm2),农田面积增加了14.3%(800 hm2);3)在过去20年间,暗针叶林的斑块数量增加了68.4%,平均斑块面积下降了49.3%(从1986年的15.1 hm2下降到2006年的7.6 hm2),最大的斑块指数下降了54.9%;景观丰富度并没有变化,但Shannon多样性指数和Shannon均匀度指数分别增加了2.7%。这都表明栖息地丧失和破碎化程度越来越严重。 在上述结果的基础上,我们进一步对栖息地变化的主要原因进行了初步分析和探讨。通过暗针叶林面积、夏季牧场面积和农田面积和当地各乡村的家庭户数、人口数量、平均家庭人口数和牲畜存栏数等统计数据的Spearman秩相关分析表明,暗针叶林面积变化分别与当地的人口数量、家庭户数和平均家庭人口数呈显著负相关,与牲畜存栏数呈负相关;而夏季牧场面积和农田面积都分别与人口数量、家庭户数和平均家庭人口数呈显著正相关,与牲畜存栏数呈正相关。这意味着在目前当地传统生产方式基本未发生改变的情况下,因人口数量增加所带来的生产等活动强度的增加是黑白仰鼻猴栖息地丧失与破碎化加剧的主要原因(R2 = 0.972);当地人类经济活动的增加,如牧场和农田扩张,牲畜存栏数增加以及薪材采集和木质建筑等导致了栖息地丧失、退化和破碎化。但另一方面,当地一妻多夫的婚配制度(仅在西藏部分地区仍有保留)对黑白仰鼻猴的栖息地保护有积极的作用,因为大家庭(家庭人口数)的人均资源消耗,如薪柴需求、房屋数量、牧场和农田等,都比小家庭低。在过去20年中(1983-2003年),当地家庭户数的增加比人口数量增加要慢,这对黑白仰鼻猴的栖息地保护起到了一定的积极作用。 因此,西藏种群作为单独的遗传亚种群,其保护工作任重而道远。
其他摘要Black-and-white snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) distribute in a restricted area of the Trans-Himalayas between the Mekong and Yangtze River, and between 26o14’N-29o20’N and 99o15’E-99o37’E. It was once listed as one of the world’s top 20 most endangered primates in 2002. There are about 1700 individuals in 15 groups remained in the habitat between 4 200 (north)-2 600 m (south) asl. Tibet is the northernmost range of the species and harbored about 300 individuals in three groups. Based on previous reports and our field survey, we identified the fir forest and the mixed conifer forest as suitable habitat of the monkey. Summer grazing lands and farmlands, which were made by local people from cutting and burning the fir forest and the mixed conifer forest at the high and low altitude belt, replaced its suitable habitat. Although wildlife is not killed by Tibetan people who practice Buddhist teachings, R. bieti lost its habitat continuously in recently decades associated with the extension of rangelands and farmlands, as well as firewood collection etc. The monkey live mainly in primary fir forest and the mixed conifer forest, to evaluate the status of the monkeys’ habitat, we employed GIS and RS software to identify the habitat types with five Landsat TM/ETM+ satellite imagery in winter of 1986, 1992, 1997, 2001 and 2006 years respectively. The work resulted in: 1) the size of summer grazing lands, farmlands, and fir forest was 13 100 hm2, 6 400 hm2, and 30 500 hm2 in 2006 respectively; 2) during the past 20 years (1986-2006), the size of fir forest (including primary fir forest and the mixed conifer forest) decreased by 14.6% (5 200 hm2), summer grazing lands and farmlands increased by 47.2% (4 200 hm2) and 14.3%(800 hm2) respectively; and 3), during the past 20 years, the number of firry forest patches increased by 68.4%, the mean size of firry forest patches decreased by 49.3% (from 15.1 to7.6 hm2), the largest patch index of firry forest decreased 54.9%; the patch richness had no change, but the Shannon's diversity index and the Shannon's evenness index increased by 2.7% respectively. These indicate the degree of habitat loss and fragmentation increased sharply during the past 20 years. We further used Spearman rank correlation coefficient to analyze the relationship of the size of fir forest, rangelands and farmlands with demographic data (such as number of households, villager population,average household size and livestock inventories). The results shown that the size of fir forest, rangelands and farmlands are significantly (positively or negatively) correlated with number of households, villager population, and livestock inventories. As the local people still employ traditional production modes, the results imply that the reduction and fragmentation of habitat for R. bieti was driven by human population growth and its increasing activities (Multiple regression, R2 = 0.972), The increased economic activities (enlarged farmlands, rangelands and livestock inventories) resulted in the habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation. On the other hand, the polyandrous marriage system (only exist in parts of Tibet) practiced by the local villagers are positive for habitat conservation, since this can reduce resource consumption (such us firewood, number of room, rangelands, farmlands) per capita in large households (that is, the number of occupants) than in small households. Furthermore, the growth in household number was much slow than population growth between 1983 and 2003, this is also positive for habitat conservation. As the Tibet population of R. bieti had been genetically divided as an isolated subpopulation. More research works and conservation actions are very important for this area .
语种中文
文献类型学位论文
条目标识符http://ir.kiz.ac.cn/handle/152453/6479
专题科研部门_生态学与环境保护中心(俞维理)
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
黄勇. 黑白仰鼻猴(Rhinopithecus bieti)西藏种群栖息地变化研究[D]. 北京. 中国科学院研究生院,2008.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
2009035.pdf(7577KB)学位论文 开放获取CC BY-NC-SA请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[黄勇]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[黄勇]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[黄勇]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。