Diversity analysis is a de facto standard procedure for most existing microbiome studies. Nevertheless, diversity metrics can be insensitive to changes in community composition (identities). For example, if species A (e.g., a beneficial microbe) is replaced by equal number of species B (e.g., an opportunistic pathogen), the diversity metric may not change, but the community composition has changed. The shared species analysis (SSA) is a computational technique that can discern changes of community composition by detecting the increase/decrease of shared species between two sets of microbiome samples, and it should be more sensitive than standard diversity analysis in discerning changes in microbiome structures. Here, we investigated the effects of ethnicity and lifestyles in China on the structure of Chinese gut microbiomes by reanalyzing the datasets of a large Chinese cohort with 300+ individuals covering 7 biggest Chinese ethnic groups (>95% Chinese population). We found: (i) Regarding lifestyles, SSA revealed significant differences between 100% of pair-wise comparisons in community compositions across all but phylum taxon levels (phylum level = 29%), but diversity analysis only revealed 14-29% pair-wise differences in community diversity across all four taxon levels. (ii) Regarding ethnicities, SSA revealed 100% pair-wise differences in community compositions across all but phylum (phylum level = 48-62%) levels, but diversity analysis only revealed 5-57% differences in community diversity across all four taxon levels. (iii) Ethnicity seems to have more prevalent effects on community structures than lifestyle does (iv) Community structures of the gut microbiomes are more stable at the phylum level than at the other three levels. (v) SSA is more powerful than diversity analysis in detecting the changes of community structures; furthermore, SSA can produce lists of unique and shared OTUs. (vi) Finally, we performed stochasticity analysis to mechanistically interpret the observed differences revealed by the SSA and diversity analyses.
Ma, ZS. Shared Species Analysis, Augmented by Stochasticity Analysis, Is More Effective Than Diversity Analysis in Detecting Variations in the Gut Microbiomes[J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY,2022,13.
APA
Ma, ZS.(2022).Shared Species Analysis, Augmented by Stochasticity Analysis, Is More Effective Than Diversity Analysis in Detecting Variations in the Gut Microbiomes.FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY,13.
MLA
Ma, ZS."Shared Species Analysis, Augmented by Stochasticity Analysis, Is More Effective Than Diversity Analysis in Detecting Variations in the Gut Microbiomes".FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY 13(2022).
修改评论